Skip to main content

[BUG?] [Using Save as in Windows 7 explorer] Saving a file with a file name same as a folder name within a directory.

I recently encounter this issue while working on a project. I am not sure whether it should be considered as a bug.. probably not.. feel free to throw your opinion

How to generate?

1.Open a new word file in Microsoft office 2010/Notepad/Any other text editor.
2.Click Save as option.
3.Try to Save the file in a directory(folder) with some sub directory inside it.
4. Try to save the file with a name exactly the same name as any of the sub directory within that directory.
Example: If we have folder name "A" try to save the file named as "A".

Actual Result:

It actually open the folder that matched with the typed file name instead of saving the file with that name.

My Concern:

It should allow saving the file instead of opening the folder. [They are different types [directory and single file]. If you later visit that directory and rename the file to the same names as one of the directory it actually works fine with same naming!]

Whether it should be considered as a bug?

It might not  be a bug but an intended use based on how windows explorer works or may be based on the  most users expectations. As sometimes you need to compromise based on the expectation of most users.

Security Check:

I talked with one of my colleague and He suggested to do a security check

"Try putting a password on a folder and seeing if you can get into the folder that way"

I tested that with password protect software and observed that password protected folder is not displayed in file explorer.So in that case I was able to save the file with the same name without any problem. 


This might have potential for harmful behavior but I can't verify that yet. Let me know if you find something interesting?


Unknown said…
Good post.Windows 7 has autorun worm.for more information about this bug i am sharing link Windows7 problem bug autorun
ZabedAkbar said…
Thank you for your comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Creating dynamic email templates using C# and Office Outlook

It is quite common for many applications to send automated email notifications. Couple of months ago, I have worked on improving our old email template format to make it more user friendly . In this tutorial I will walk you though regarding how I took advantage of Microsoft Outlook to quickly generate custom email template and later using the html template for building an automated custom email application using C#. Steps: Creating Templates: Using the rich text editor support  in Outlook create a nicely formatted email. Use placeholder text for the values you like to change dynamically based on your task completion status. To keep this tutorial simple, I have created a  simple table with placeholder text inside the third bracket  [place holder text]. However, you can use anything supported by outlook editor. Figure: Email Template Getting HTML code: Send the created email to your own address. After that, open the sent email and right click to view source . It

Why using XOR might not be a good hash code implementation?

Using XOR for computing hash codes works great for most of the cases specially when order of computation does not matter. It also has the following benefits: XOR has the best bit shuffling properties of all bit-operations and provides better distributions of hash values. It is a quick single cycle operation in most computer  Order of computation does not matter. i.e. a^b = b^a However, if ordering of elements matter then it is often not a good choice. Example For simplicity consider you have a class with two string properties named Prop1 and Prop2  and your GetHashCode returns the xor of their hash code. It will work fine for most of the cases except cases where same values are assigned to different properties. It will generate same hash-code i.e. collision in that case as can be seen in the below example . However, using the modified approach as recommenced by Joshua Bloch's in Effective Java which uses prime multiplication and hash chaining provides more unif

SQL Performance improvement for User defined table types

Recently, I have dealt with an interesting performance issue with one of my SQL query and thought I will share the experience here. Context: We had a legacy stored procedure responsible for saving large amount of excel row data to our database tables. It was using   User Defined Table Types as one of the parameter to get a list of row data from excel. However, the stored procedure was taking very long time to save the large data set. Root Cause: After quite a bit of investigation using execution plan in SSMS, I was able to narrow down the performance issue to the following: Joining with User defined table type was taking >90 percent of the time A custom hash function which has been used multiple times as a join criteria was also quite expensive to compute. After doing additional research using stack overflow , I was able to figure out that the primary reason for the poor performance doing a  JOIN on Table Valued parameters is that : it does not keep statistics and a